Productive Capacity Buffers Gender Inclusion Effects on African Governance

New study reveals that gender inclusion impacts governance differently depending on a country's economic productive capacity across 51 African nations

FE
FIRAT EditorialResearch Contributor
Sep 14, 2026
4 min read
Share:
Productive Capacity Buffers Gender Inclusion Effects on African Governance

ABIDJAN, Sept 14, 2026

In a counterintuitive finding that challenges conventional wisdom across Sub-Saharan Africa, a new study reveals that gender inclusion can negatively impact governance unless paired with strong productive capacity.

The research, published on September 12, 2026 in the peer-reviewed journal Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, offers a nuanced view of how women's participation in political and economic spheres translates into governance outcomes across 51 African countries.

Lead author Ekene ThankGod Emeka and co-author Simplice A. Asongu examined the relationship between gender inclusion and governance using comprehensive data spanning 2010 to 2022. Their work suggests that without adequate economic foundations, efforts to increase women's representation may inadvertently create governance challenges rather than solving them.

Productive capacity, in the economic literature, refers to the combination of resources, infrastructure, technological capability, institutional quality, and human capital that determines what an economy can produce and how efficiently it can do so. Economies with high productive capacity tend to have diversified industrial bases, reliable energy and transport systems, and educated workforces.

The study employed pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and interactive System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimators to account for endogeneity and establish causal relationships. This rigorous methodology examined gender inclusion through indicators such as female labor force participation, female self-employment, female political representation, and female employment indices.

Governance outcomes were measured using standard metrics including rule of law, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, control of corruption, and accountability.

"We found that enhanced productive capacity mitigates the unconditional negative effect of gender inclusion, thereby fostering improved governance outcomes," the research team states.

The findings indicate that in countries with lower productive capacity, increased gender inclusion can initially strain governance systems. However, once productive capacity reaches certain threshold levels, the relationship reverses, and gender inclusion begins to positively influence governance.

On one side, stronger governance can expand opportunities for women by enforcing anti-discrimination protections and opening access to education and financial services. On the other side, greater gender inclusion can improve governance outcomes by diversifying the perspectives represented in decision-making bodies, reducing corruption risks, and aligning public policy more closely with the needs of the full population.

The authors note that Africa continues to grapple with entrenched patriarchal norms, restrictive legal frameworks, and socio-cultural barriers that limit women's full economic engagement. These contextual factors mean that simply increasing women's representation without addressing underlying economic constraints may not yield the expected benefits.

The study identifies specific threshold levels at which the reversal from negative to positive effects occurs. This finding has direct policy implications for development organizations and government policymakers across the continent.

"Without the right economic conditions, gender inclusion risks becoming a political liability rather than an asset," the authors explain. "Productive capacity acts as a necessary precondition for women's participation to translate into governance gains."

The research adds to a growing body of scholarship arguing that economic and institutional foundations of a society influence how effectively women can participate in governance. Previous studies have shown that women's participation in labor markets enhances productivity and social cohesion, but this work provides more granular evidence about the conditions under which these benefits materialize.

For policymakers, the implications are clear. Efforts to promote gender inclusion must be accompanied by investments in infrastructure, education, skills development, and economic diversification. Gender quotas and representation targets alone cannot substitute for broader economic development.

The findings also have relevance for international development agencies and donors who fund gender and governance programs across Africa. Programs that focus exclusively on political representation without addressing economic empowerment may fall short of their intended objectives.

As Africa moves forward with its development agenda and implementation of the African Union's Agenda 2063 and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, these insights provide a roadmap for more effective interventions. The goal should be to build economies where gender inclusion and governance quality reinforce each other rather than compete for limited institutional capacity.

The study was conducted without human participant research, so no ethical approval or informed consent was required. All data analyzed were from publicly available sources covering national statistics and international databases.

For researchers and students in development economics, political science, and gender studies, the paper provides a comprehensive empirical analysis with reproducible methodology. The findings challenge simple narratives about gender and governance, suggesting that context and underlying economic conditions matter critically.

As African countries continue to develop their democratic institutions and economic systems, understanding these nuanced relationships will be essential for designing policies that genuinely advance both gender equality and governance quality. The evidence suggests that the path forward requires integrated approaches that address economic and political dimensions simultaneously.

Sources

  • Scienmag, September 13, 2026 —
  • Nature/Springer, September 12, 2026 —

Share this research insight

Help circulate peer-reviewed evidence and institutional briefings.

Share:
FE
Author Spotlight

FIRAT Editorial

Research Contributor · Foresight Institute of Research and Translation

FIRAT Editorial contributes to FIRAT's mission of generating evidence-based research and translating scientific breakthroughs into sustainable African development.

Focus:ResearchInnovationDevelopment
More Research

Related Articles in Social and Management Sciences (SMS)

View all in SMS