Rome, Italy · 15 April 2020 — As the COVID-19 pandemic forced countries into unprecedented lockdowns, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) issued a stark assessment: the world was not running out of food, but the complex machinery that delivers it to people was breaking down. The organisation warned that logistical disruptions, labour shortages, and collapsing incomes could trigger a food access crisis affecting hundreds of millions, particularly in the developing world.
The FAO's monitoring throughout early 2020 revealed that global food supplies — particularly staple crops like cereals — remained adequate. Global cereal stocks were at comfortable levels, and harvest forecasts for major producing regions were broadly favourable. The problem lay not in production but in the agri-food value chain that connects farms to consumers.
Five Channels of Disruption
The FAO identified five critical areas where the pandemic was straining food systems:
| Disruption Channel | Impact | Most Affected |
|---|---|---|
| Logistical restrictions | Border closures and transport bans impeded movement of food and agricultural inputs | Landlocked countries, regional trade |
| Protectionist trade policies | Export restrictions threatened to amplify price volatility | Net food-importing countries |
| Labour shortages | Migrant worker restrictions hit labour-intensive production | Horticulture, livestock, meat processing |
| Demand-side shocks | Closure of restaurants and schools shifted demand patterns | Perishable goods producers |
| Processing facility outbreaks | Illness among workers forced plant shutdowns | Meat packing, food processing |
Logistical and Movement Restrictions
Lockdowns and border closures hindered the movement of both goods and people. These restrictions impeded the transportation of food products and limited the ability of agricultural workers to perform essential tasks. In parts of West Africa, border closures disrupted the cross-border trade in grains and livestock that many communities depend on. In South Asia, restrictions on internal movement delayed the transport of perishable produce from farms to urban markets.
Protectionist Trade Policies
In an effort to secure local supplies and prevent price spikes, some countries implemented export restrictions. The FAO warned that such protectionist measures could be counterproductive and exacerbate food price inflation. The organisation pointed to the 2007–2008 food price crisis, when export bans by major producers triggered panic buying and price spikes that pushed an estimated 75 million people into hunger.
Labour and Input Shortages
Labour-intensive production systems, including those relying on migrant labour, were heavily impacted. In Europe and North America, restrictions on seasonal workers threatened fruit and vegetable harvests. In India, the lockdown stranded millions of migrant agricultural workers far from their farms at the peak of the wheat harvest season.
Furthermore, small-scale producers in many regions faced mounting challenges in accessing essential agricultural inputs such as seeds, fertilisers, and feed. Supply chains for these inputs were disrupted by the same logistical constraints affecting food transport.
Demand-Side Shocks
The closure of restaurants, schools, and other food service sectors caused a sharp decline in demand for certain perishable goods — fruits, vegetables, and high-value commodities — at the start of the pandemic. Dairy farmers in Europe and North America were forced to dump milk when processing plants could not redirect supply from institutional to retail channels. Consumer demand simultaneously shifted toward retail and online grocery delivery, creating mismatches between where food was produced and where it was needed.
Processing Facility Disruptions
High rates of illness among workers in the food system, particularly in meat-packing plants where close working conditions facilitated viral transmission, led to temporary facility shutdowns. In the United States, several major meat processing plants closed in April and May 2020, creating bottlenecks in the supply chain that left farmers with animals they could not process and consumers facing temporary shortages at grocery stores.
The Real Threat: Purchasing Power
The FAO emphasised that the pandemic's impact was uneven. While global markets eventually stabilised and excessive protectionism was largely avoided, countries already facing conflict, economic instability, or those heavily dependent on food and oil exports remained at the highest risk.
The organisation's modelling suggested that the economic recession triggered by the pandemic could push an additional 83 to 132 million people into chronic hunger by the end of 2020, on top of the 690 million already undernourished before the crisis. This projection was later confirmed by the 2021 State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report, which estimated that between 720 and 811 million people faced hunger in 2020 — an increase of up to 161 million from the previous year.
Policy Recommendations
The FAO outlined a set of policy priorities for governments:
- Ensure food supply chains remain functional — designating food system workers as essential and keeping borders open to food trade
- Strengthen social protection — expanding cash transfer programmes and food assistance to protect the purchasing power of vulnerable populations
- Support small-scale producers — ensuring access to inputs, credit, and markets to maintain production for the next planting season
- Monitor food prices and markets — tracking domestic and international prices to detect emerging crises early
- Invest in resilience — building more diverse and resilient food systems to withstand future shocks
A Wake-Up Call for Food Systems
The pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global food systems that had been acknowledged but insufficiently addressed. The concentration of processing capacity in large facilities, the dependence of many countries on food imports, and the fragility of just-in-time supply chains all contributed to the disruption.
The crisis also accelerated certain trends. Direct-to-consumer sales, community-supported agriculture, and digital market platforms saw rapid growth as conventional supply chains faltered. Some governments used the disruption as an opportunity to invest in local food production and shorter supply chains, though the FAO cautioned against equating food self-sufficiency with food security.
Sources
- FAO, Impact of COVID-19 on Food and Agriculture:
- FAO, COVID-19 and Food Safety:
- OECD, Food Supply Chains and COVID-19: Impacts and Policy Lessons:
- FAO, The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021:
- FAO Open Knowledge Repository:
FIRAT Editorial Board
Institutional Research Desk · Foresight Institute of Research and Translation
The collective editorial and research translation board of FIRAT, synthesising peer-reviewed evidence, policy briefs, and division milestones across our seven foundational research pillars.
