Norwich, United Kingdom · 19 May 2020
At the peak of global COVID-19 confinement measures in early April 2020, daily global carbon dioxide emissions fell by 17% compared to the mean daily levels of 2019 — the largest emissions drop ever recorded. The finding, published in the journal Nature Climate Change on 19 May 2020, provided the first comprehensive analysis of how pandemic-related lockdowns affected global carbon emissions.
The study, titled "Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement," was led by Professor Corinne Le Quere of the University of East Anglia in collaboration with an international team of researchers from the UK, France, Switzerland, the United States, Australia, and other countries.
Methodology: A New Approach to Real-Time Emissions Tracking
The researchers used a novel methodology to estimate daily CO2 emissions during the pandemic. Rather than relying on annual fossil fuel statistics — which are typically published with a lag of one to two years — the team combined real-time data on energy consumption, mobility indicators, and government confinement policies across 69 countries, 50 U.S. states, and 30 Chinese provinces.
The dataset covered sectors responsible for 86% of global fossil CO2 emissions, including ground transport, aviation, industry, power generation, and residential buildings. The researchers used confinement indices to categorise countries by the severity of their lockdown measures and applied emissions changes accordingly.
Sector-by-Sector Breakdown
The emissions decline was driven by changes in human activity across multiple sectors:
| Sector | Share of Emissions Decrease | Key Activity Change |
|---|---|---|
| Surface transport | ~43% | Drastic reduction in car, bus, and truck travel |
| Industry and power | ~43% | Factory closures and reduced electricity demand |
| Aviation | ~10% | Near-total grounding of commercial flights |
| Residential | Slight increase | More heating and cooking at home partially offset reductions |
Surface transport — primarily road travel — accounted for approximately 43% of the decrease, as lockdowns kept billions of people at home and emptied roads worldwide. Industry and power generation combined accounted for another 43%, as factories halted production and electricity demand dropped in commercial districts. Aviation, despite being the sector most visibly affected by the pandemic, accounted for only about 10% of the total decrease, reflecting its relatively small share of global emissions.
The increase in residential emissions from people working and cooking at home only marginally offset the reductions in other sectors.
Annual Impact and Historical Context
While the daily peak reduction was extreme, the researchers projected that the total annual decline for 2020 would be between 4% and 7%, depending on the duration and stringency of confinement measures and the pace of economic recovery. Subsequent data from the Global Carbon Project confirmed an annual reduction of approximately 6.3%.
For context, the 2008-2009 global financial crisis produced an annual emissions decline of approximately 1.4%. The 2020 drop was more than four times larger, reflecting the unprecedented scale of global lockdowns.
No Lasting Climate Impact
A critical finding of the study was that the pandemic-induced emissions reduction had no detectable impact on atmospheric CO2 concentrations or the trajectory of climate change. Because carbon dioxide accumulates in the atmosphere — with a residence time of centuries to millennia — a temporary reduction in the flow of emissions does not alter the overall stock.
The researchers compared the situation to a bathtub: turning the tap down slightly does not stop the water level from rising, as long as the tap remains on. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations continued their upward trajectory in 2020, reaching an annual average of 412.5 parts per million at Mauna Loa Observatory — 2.6 ppm higher than 2019.
The Path Forward: Systemic Change Over Crisis
Professor Le Quere and her co-authors were explicit about the implications of their findings. The reductions achieved during the pandemic were the result of an involuntary economic and health crisis, not structural shifts in energy systems. Social responses alone — such as behavioural changes during lockdowns — are insufficient to reach net-zero emissions goals.
The study argued that long-term, systemic changes are required, including:
- Active transport: Shifting from private car use to walking, cycling, and public transport
- Energy efficiency: Improving building insulation, industrial processes, and appliance standards
- Renewable energy: Accelerating the transition from fossil fuels to wind, solar, and other clean energy sources
- Industrial policy: Green recovery packages that direct economic stimulus toward low-carbon infrastructure
The research was published at a pivotal moment, as governments worldwide were beginning to design economic recovery packages in response to the pandemic. The authors' message was clear: the pandemic had demonstrated that rapid emissions reductions are physically possible, but achieving them sustainably requires deliberate policy choices, not crisis-driven lockdowns.
Sources
- Le Quere, C. et al. (2020). "Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement." Nature Climate Change, 10, 647-653.
- University of East Anglia press release:
- Global Carbon Project:
- Earth.org analysis:
- Science Media Centre expert reactions:
FIRAT Editorial Board
Institutional Research Desk · Foresight Institute of Research and Translation
The collective editorial and research translation board of FIRAT, synthesising peer-reviewed evidence, policy briefs, and division milestones across our seven foundational research pillars.
